# The Universal Law of Attraction – How Many Universal Laws Are There Anyway?

There are reputedly two theoretical opposite numbers in our real world, or in our physics. Firstly, there may be the concept that from the beginning, there may be an endless variety of parallel universes in which all matters which could occur, do occur. Our Universe is just certainly one of that countless set. In 5 of those universes, you 1) turn a coin – in one, it’s a heads you flip; in any other, tails; inside the 0.33, the coin stands on side! Or, in a fourth universe you decide no longer to flip a coin at all, or in universe #five you make a decision to turn some thing else instead.

The other theoretical set of parallel universes is a làm bằng đại học fixed that ever will increase, staring with just one. Universes break up each time an both/or choice is compelled upon it, such that each one results which could appear, manifest. In this (our) Universe you decide now not to turn a coin – however that selection consequences in a division, the universe splits and in that cut up, within the new universe, you do flip a coin. In that universe it comes up heads. But, that universe then splits into two and but every other universe wherein your flip has tails comes up. There’s additionally another universe wherein the coin lands on part! There’s additionally a universe that originally splits off in which you make a decision to flip some thing other than a coin. This is referred to as the ‘Many Worlds Interpretation’ principle, (which resulted out of a need to explain sure quantum phenomena). With each passing second, an increasing number of universes department off (clearly trillions in line with second).

I’ve never been keen on the Many Worlds Interpretation of all things quantum. That is, the universe continues splitting on every occasion it involves a fork in the road. The question of where all of the depend/electricity comes from – created out of not anything seemingly – I’ve yet to see addressed inside the texts. But, many great scientists adopt it – perhaps because the least of all the evils sure quantum phenomena dish up. As to where they suit, all the ones extra universes, it truly is now not as plenty of a trouble. A resort with an infinite variety of rooms never has to put out a ‘no emptiness’ signal – in case you get the analogy. Oh, the Many Worlds Interpretation additionally approach that there’s no such component as loose will. You might imagine you’ve got unfastened will in deciding to wear your purple get dressed as opposed to your green get dressed, however in the Many Worlds Interpretation, you do both – so no unfastened will.

However, I myself cross for the Copenhagen Interpretation* – when you come to a fork in the road, one and simplest one preference is made – the opposite viable choice(s) are never realized and ultimately by no means have any reality. But, in case you start out from scratch with an endless number of universes, or as a minimum a extensive number, then the difficulty of ‘in which’ all of the universes are is irrelevant, and the introduction of all of the stuff that makes them up is equally beside the point. In the start, it became so!

You may have an infinite quantity of universes in an infinite quantity of space. An analogy – there are an infinite range of entire numbers like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc. There’s also an countless quantity of even numbers such as 2, 4, 6, eight, 10, 12, etc. Ditto an infinite number of extraordinary numbers. Yet the infinite set of even numbers, plus the limitless variety of ordinary numbers, equals the limitless set of complete numbers. Infinity + infinity = infinity! Or, if you like, consider your house (volume) with simply one molecule (universe) in it. You’d agree there is room for one hell of a lot more molecules (universes). If your home had endless extent, then…

I had usually assumed, and followed the assumptions of others infinitely more outstanding than I, that such theoretical structures, such parallel / alternative / reflect universes, was for all time beyond our actual attain – works of fiction apart of route. We ought to assemble them as an highbrow workout, however ought to never affirm and recognize the real existence of those mental or thought experiments. That’s because these universes, if they exist, would no longer be a part of our space-time continuum and thusly we could by no means have interaction with them.

But what if that assumption is inaccurate? What if parallel / alternative / reflect universes no longer handiest exist, however can and do engage with ours, and thereby deliver a few extra credence to the adventures of our “Alice in Wonderland” and “Star Trek” characters, not to say the reputations of those physicists who suggest endless universes or Many Worlds Interpretation theories.

Micro & Macro Mysteries: Well, those assumptions simply may now be positioned to the test. I’d like to have the ability to say I thought of this concept, even independently, it is simply that first rate. Alas, I didn’t, and I’m kicking myself as it’s in order that easy and elegant. The credit score for this goes to physicist David Deutsch, and for a fuller and better define of his proposals, see his ebook cited underneath**.

The fundamentals are as follows and deals with the paradoxical and well-known ‘double slit’ experiment with mild – an experiment with photons.